From Sham Beam Sent Thu, Oct 23rd 2014, 07:33
that's a must buy if it makes sound on the way down. add 99 tracks to a CD and hit random play. Glitchtastic! On 10/23/2014 6:31 PM, Esa Juhani Ruoho wrote: > for a miniscule investment of 0.03, you can purchase the awesome glitch > package "the whole app crashes" > --- > http://lackluster.bandcamp.com > http://lackluster.org > http://esaruoho.tumblr.com > iPhone: +358403703659 > >> On 23 Oct 2014, at 10:30, Sham Beam <xxxx.xxxx@xxxxx.xxx >> <mailto:xxxx.xxxx@xxxxx.xxx>> wrote: >> >> that's b-grade. >> >> >> On 10/23/2014 6:26 PM, Esa Juhani Ruoho wrote: >>> there is also a "i'm too poor to accomplish anything" 0.99 glitch >>> package that just randomly cuts out all audio for 3 seconds. >>> >>> --- >>> http://lackluster.bandcamp.com >>> http://lackluster.org >>> http://esaruoho.tumblr.com >>> iPhone: +358403703659 >>> >>>> On 23 Oct 2014, at 10:25, Sham Beam <xxxx.xxxx@xxxxx.xxx >>>> <mailto:xxxx.xxxx@xxxxx.xxx>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Damn, that's some premium glitching! Must be awesome, sold! >>>> >>>> An artist could have a bigger audience if they provided multiple mixes >>>> based on the listeners preferences. Clark with slide guitar for >>>> country fans. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/23/2014 6:22 PM, Esa Ruoho wrote: >>>>> would you like the premium glitch package for the 16.99 - >>>>> guaranteed to >>>>> glitch up all the tracks in the application! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 23 October 2014 10:20, Sham Beam <xxxx.xxxx@xxxxx.xxx >>>>> <mailto:xxxx.xxxx@xxxxx.xxx> >>>>> <mailto:xxxx.xxxx@xxxxx.xxx>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> more glitches!! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 10/23/2014 5:36 PM, Esa Ruoho wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ahh, i see what you mean John - build your own tracks by >>>>> artist xyz, >>>>> made to-order. >>>>> like a subway sandwich. >>>>> "i'll have 909 claps and a 606 rimshot, and a walking acoustic >>>>> bassline, >>>>> hold the glitches" >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 23 October 2014 09:33, John D. <xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx >>>>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx> >>>>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx> >>>>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.__xx >>>>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Might work. Maybe an artist could have an individual app. >>>>> >>>>> I like my idea though. "Want some claps here? Pay just >>>>> $.09!" >>>>> >>>>> nah, more like, you have an album, but to unlock extra >>>>> bonus >>>>> tracks, you have to pay 0.99 or so. and then they'd be >>>>> inside the >>>>> app. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 23 October 2014 05:19, John D. >>>>> <xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx >>>>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx> <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx> >>>>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.__xx >>>>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> With sounds missing, like? It could be ambient >>>>> maybe unless >>>>> you purchased the beats. >>>>> >>>>> there's that word "decent" right between >>>>> "got" and >>>>> "monetization". >>>>> >>>>> i wonder if an album app with in-app-purchases >>>>> would make a dime >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> http://lackluster.bandcamp.com >>>>> http://lackluster.org >>>>> http://esaruoho.tumblr.com >>>>> iPhone: +358403703659 <tel:%2B358403703659> >>>>> <tel:%2B358403703659> >>>>> >>>>> On 22 Oct 2014, at 23:52, Esa Juhani Ruoho >>>>> <xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx >>>>> <mailto:xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> >>>>> <mailto:xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> >>>>> <mailto:xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx >>>>> <mailto:xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> so anyone think Best Fiends has got >>>>> monetization or is it >>>>> all an in-app-purchase rip-off? >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> http://lackluster.bandcamp.com >>>>> <http://lackluster.bandcamp.__com/ >>>>> <http://lackluster.bandcamp.com/>> >>>>> http://lackluster.org <http://lackluster.org/> >>>>> http://esaruoho.tumblr.com <http://esaruoho.tumblr.com/> >>>>> iPhone: +358403703659 <tel:%2B358403703659> >>>>> <tel:%2B358403703659> >>>>> >>>>> On 22 Oct 2014, at 23:51, Jared Dunne >>>>> <xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx <mailto:xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> >>>>> <mailto:xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> >>>>> <mailto:xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx >>>>> <mailto:xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Be well, my friend, Jon. >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 22, 2014 3:49 PM, "Jon Sands" >>>>> <xxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx >>>>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> <mailto:xxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> >>>>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx >>>>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 10/22/2014 3:31 PM, Jared Dunne >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Oh, the beautiful human trait >>>>> of deflection. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nah, I think I just speak for the >>>>> majority of this list >>>>> (and Zack summed it up well) that >>>>> nobody is really >>>>> interested in wasting any more >>>>> effort responding to the >>>>> extremely poor straw man you have >>>>> repeatedly tried to >>>>> make. We'd rather talk about >>>>> something interesting. I >>>>> think the moment you made the >>>>> hilarious comparison of >>>>> physical objects to copyright, most >>>>> of the people here >>>>> lost interest in you. It's ok >>>>> though, I'm sure you'll >>>>> get some poor sap here soon willing >>>>> to argue with you >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jon Sands >>>>> Fohdeesha Media >>>>> http://fohdeesha.com/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Sham Beam >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sham Beam >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Sham Beam >> >> > -- Sham Beam