From Alan R. Lucas Sent Sat, Nov 1st 1997, 07:04
>What makes you think you have an innate right to hear a given recording? >You're just rationalizing an illegal and unethical practice. > >("I want that new Mercedes, but it's too expensive. How else can I own it, >if I don't steal it?") > >C. okay... i'm sorry, but this comparison is simply *ridiculous*. what separates me from buying a mercedes benz? a)the fact that i think they're awful cars. i'd rather get a BMW if i'm spending that much. b)MONEY. i don't have it. you're right. it's too expensive. now... what separates me from buying, say, AFX hangable autobulb 2? money? not really. if i could find it in a store, i'd be willing to pay for it. no. what separates me from this and other releases that are ten times more rare is a supertiny print-run and subsequent deletion by the label. what are you trying to say? i don't "have the right" to hear the music cause i wasn't into it at the right time and i wasn't born in england and i didn't have a turntable? i'm having a really hard time biting my tongue here. what is the point of releasing music to the public if the public can't buy it. or if they can, they have to be part of some secret cult, the chosen few, blah blah blah. blech. if labels and artists want to limited runs, fine, but why not do unlimiteds too? same music, different package or autographed or whatever. "hmm... i think i'll release this one today... but only to fifty people." and then you expect people not to dub stuff? i bet a lot of people that are talking against this used to think it was fine to have copies on *tape* because hey, it's just a tape. but now, anyone can enjoy the quality of *CD*! that's just not right! we can't let people have music and good sound, now can we? man... get some better analogies or something. and go listent to your limited releases, since you the innate right to hear them. alan!steamed. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com