From James Meagher Sent Mon, Apr 2nd 2018, 15:32
From James Meagher Sent Mon, Apr 2nd 2018, 15:32
Bah ha ha ha! I don=E2=80=99t know. It seems that if it=E2=80=99s used and can no longer b= e purchased new the adjective is up for grabs. There seem to be a bunch of =E2= =80=9Cvintage=E2=80=9D Korg MS2000=E2=80=99s about these days . . . and I th= ink it does make them sound at least a little bit better.=20 Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 2, 2018, at 10:26 AM, DJ Maytag <xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote: >=20 > I see the term vintage being thrown out there on CL ads for mid-to-late 90= =E2=80=99s digital synths (sorry, but your XP-50 is NOT vintage!), but I was= wondering what people thought about things produced from the Bass Station 1= and onward being considered vintage? That synth seems to mark the start of n= ew analog production, but is that and a handful of other new analog/VA reall= y vintage now? >=20 > When I started my hunt for my first synth (1993), a =E2=80=9Cvintage polys= ynth=E2=80=9D like a Matrix-1000 or a JX-10 was =E2=80=9Conly=E2=80=9D about= 7 years old and the SH-101 was barely more than a decade. Nobody seemed to b= link at them being considered vintage in our little circle of Synth nerds, b= ut obviously not =E2=80=9CVINTAGE=E2=80=9D like we=E2=80=99re seeing on eBay= now. >=20 > Hope this makes sense. >=20 > Mitch >=20 >=20