From alt-mode Sent Sat, Oct 27th 2018, 22:04
From alt-mode Sent Sat, Oct 27th 2018, 22:04
I think it was more of a situation that you couldn=E2=80=99t retune the =
sequencers during a performance. You really needed them set up and =
tuned in advance and, while you could change the base voltage, you =
couldn=E2=80=99t really change the step voltage live. However, the 960 =
sequencer has some great features for skipping steps and resetting on a =
particular step that can make them a creative performance tool with some =
practice.
Moog has always been 1V/oct.
I=E2=80=99m amused with the inspiration for the album name. That was =
the first video game we had at home!
Eric
> On Oct 27, 2018, at 5:51 PM, Brian Willoughby =
<xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>=20
> Enjoyed the article. Thanks Lorne and Jason.
>=20
> I=E2=80=99m curious about the statement from Tangerine Dream that the =
sequences could not be transposed. Were the Moog oscillators of the =
mid-seventies not based on 1 V/octave? If they were 1 V/octave (or =
Buchla 1.2 V/octave), then all it would take is a CV mixer to add (or =
subtract) a constant voltage before feeding the oscillator(s) input.
>=20
> What am I missing here? (clearly, I have no experience with =
mid-seventies synth modules)
>=20
> Brian
>=20
>=20
> On Oct 27, 2018, at 1:31 PM, Jason Proctor <xxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>>=20
>> posted to Bacefook by Lorne Hammond --
>>=20
>> https://musicaficionado.blog/2017/09/05/ricochet-by-tangerine-dream/
>>=20
>> (i love the inspiration for the album name! nothing like what i would =
have expected)
>=20
>=20