From KumquatGoo Sent Tue, Apr 13th 1999, 04:27
<<"provides funding for the Revolution." ? This is sarcasm, right?>> For the record, this was indeed sarcasm. I just couldn't quite find it in my heart to use the winking emoticon convention ;) <<Generally, funds from drug deals go to support the BMW driving, Polo wearing, McDonald's eating, consumer based material, dollar ( fill in denomination ) spending white male hierarchy.>> Briefly, please explain how this works. I'm not saying that it's right or wrong, I'm just curious. Sorry if this conversation isn't obviously music-related (unless you're Simon Reynolds...oops, didn't mean to bring *him* up again). <<I'd start buying drugs if it helped fund the Revolution.....imagine, ecstacy dollars funding counter culture anti establishment warfare. Wow, what a day that'd be. Here's 30 bucks for my bunk pills, now go shoot a bank CEO with the money I just handed you.>> This is sarcasm, right? (from a different post) << hope this doesn't come off as reactionary, cuz i'm just as down with a economic revolution around here as the next guy, but i think this belief is a ridiculous attempt to justify a hedonistic lifestyle via some political fantasy.>> Actually, it was meant to be a ridiculous attempt at poking fun at Simon Reynolds. <<i mean, come on, first of all, how many poor people are getting addicted to various drugs, staying poor because they have to feed their habit or (and maybe this is worse) are using them as a substitute for productive thought or activity? i would have to say the sheer number of the underclass that get sacrificed in this supposed "subversion" of the rich is reason enough to throw out this philosophy. but secondly, by selling these kids drugs, you're only reinforcing their paralytic lifestyle... they're using their free time to turn their free will over to some chemicals, they're being purely hedonistic.>> Without in any way belittling the drug-related problems of the poor, some suspect that drug abuse can be found across all economic strata. As for "substitute for productive thought and activity" and "turning free will over," the first thing that comes to my mind is *television*. << if you enable this, you're reinforcing the same type of philosophy of inertia that keeps these kids from attempting to do anything about changing anything about their cushy lives, much less changing anything about the society that keepst he lives cushy.>> It's difficult to motivate change among the cushy people...what should we do? - fred church xxxxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx