From Kenny Balys Sent Wed, Dec 26th 2018, 19:07
From Kenny Balys Sent Wed, Dec 26th 2018, 19:07
The 25 is oversized for me. I should have gotten the 12. It looks really cool though... :) On 26.12.18 18:52 , Boniforti Flavio wrote: > No worries! > I might go for the 12... > F. > > mark c <xxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx <mailto:xxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>> schrieb > am Mi., 26. Dez. 2018, 19:48: > > Hi, I've got the five, I would have gone for the twelve nowadays. > > Sorry if you were asking Kenny, I thought I should answer though. > > > On Wednesday, December 26, 2018, Boniforti Flavio <xxxxxxxxx.x@xxxxx.xxx > <mailto:xxxxxxxxx.x@xxxxx.xxx>> wrote: > > Is your 25 oversized? > F. > > mark c <xxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx <mailto:xxxxx.xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>> > schrieb am Mi., 26. Dez. 2018, 18:56: > > I know we all have different requirements but I quickly wished I'd > bought a thru-12 instead. > > On Wednesday, December 26, 2018, Boniforti Flavio > <xxxxxxxxx.x@xxxxx.xxx <mailto:xxxxxxxxx.x@xxxxx.xxx>> wrote: > > Thanks for your suggestion, Kenny... in my case I believe 5-THRU > is enough. I need to only "clock": > MF-104M > MF-105M > Mo-FX (2x) > mmmhhhh... but maybe I can MIDI sync also my REV-7 and RV-4 - so > I'd need to maybe "upgrade" to the 12-THRU version... :-) > > BR, > F. > https://soundcloud.com/bonnyfused > > > Am Mi., 26. Dez. 2018 um 18:49 Uhr schrieb Kenny Balys > <xxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx <mailto:xxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx>>: > > > +1 on the Kenton splitter. I have the long stick version: > (THRU-25) > > http://www.kentonuk.com/products/items/utilities/m-thru-25.shtml > > This approach allows me to keep the studio core permanently > hooked up > but to have a the satellite stuff unhooked and ready. Its > quick and > easy to make anything work with everything. Some stuff does > not work > well on a busy bus: Emax, Poly6 with rev0 CHD MIDI, et c. > These instruments > are only hung on the MIDI as needed. > > > On 26.12.18 17:33 , mark c wrote: > > I clock a tr-08, mfb502 and tt303 from an sbx-1 into a kenton midi thru-5 > > (splitter), it works fine with internal clock and even slaved to computer USB if > > that helps? > > > > The other SBX midi clock goes out to a sequencer and then back into the sbx for > > the internal midi/cv converter and works fine as well, I've found it's pretty > > much impossible to make a mistake with the SBX. > > > > > > On Wednesday, December 26, 2018, Boniforti Flavio <xxxxxxxxx.x@xxxxx.xxx <mailto:xxxxxxxxx.x@xxxxx.xxx> > > <mailto:xxxxxxxxx.x@xxxxx.xxx <mailto:xxxxxxxxx.x@xxxxx.xxx>>> wrote: > > > > Hi all! > > I'm now wiring up my studio and am facing the MIDI part... > > I do have 4 MP-88 (Miditemp) which I use to connect all devices and I do > > have 1 master MIDI clock - SBX-1 > > Now, I've connected the SBX-1 to my "primary" MP-88 and thought I'd connect > > all other MP-88 interfaces duplex (MIDI IN & OUT) to the "primary" MP-88. > > This way I could distribute the MIDI clock to all equipment and also I would > > be able to route my sequencer's outputs to whatever synth I'd like to. > > But as I also got some devices which just need MIDI clock and nothing else, > > I was thinking about using the second MIDI output from the SBX-1, wire it to > > a "MIDI replicator" and connect to the latter only devices in need of a MIDI > > clock (MF-104M, MF-105M, Mo-FX). This way I would not need to occupy MIDI > > ports on my MP-88s "just for the sync"... And also I would not want to use > > THRU interfaces (for example to pass the MIDI clock from the Mo-FX to the > > MF-104M or similar). > > > > What are your thoughts about the above idea? Am I going the wrong path? Did > > I miss something? > > > > Thanks for your replies, > > Flavio. > >https://soundcloud.com/bonnyfused >