Re: (idm) R&S up Microsoft's arse???

From Nate Harrison
Sent Wed, Nov 11th 1998, 19:24

On top of the technical faux pas add the fact that the site is a big bowl
of butt hair. Jesus the thing is ugly.

What happened to the better design they had up there a year or two ago?
(ok so I haven't been there in a while)...


peace

Nate



On Wed, 11 Nov 1998 xxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx wrote:

> Ernesto Ikerd wrote:
> > if you DONT use the Microsoft browser you will not see a damn thing. If
> > you look at the source it has "Microsoft" tags all through it, leaving
> > Netsapers out in the cold.  Is this what R&S wants?
>=20
> How short people's memories are. It was just barely a year ago that IE 4.=
0
> came out, the first version that finally made it possible to view the
> plethora of poorly-designed, works-with-Netscape-only, nonstandard
> "Netscape" tag-ridden web sites.
>=20
> However, a cursory glance at the document source of the first frames
> doesn't reveal any glaring errors in the HTML -- in fact, there aren't
> really any Microsoft tags that aren't presented in the context of valid
> HTML (as comments or meta data). The problem with the site (to turn this
> into constructive criticism) is the sloppy, inconsiderate practice of
> making all navigation buttons Java applets and JavaScript forms!
>=20
> obIDM: What happened to the October reissue of 808 State's Newbuild on
> Rephlex? Not that I mind my original retaining its value...
>=20
>    - Mike
>=20
> ______________________________________________________________________
>  Mike Brown / Hyperreal   |     Director, Hyperreal Music Archive
>  PO Box 61334             |      http://www.hyperreal.org/music/
>  Denver CO 80206-8334 USA | hire me. r=E9sum=E9 =3D www.hyperreal.org/~mi=
ke/
>=20