Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good.

From wells
Sent Thu, Aug 6th 1998, 21:14

At 01:05 PM 8/6/98 -0700, Chris.Hilker wrote:
>>there is more to making the music than sticking a few patch leads in
>>and clicking up a row of bars in cubase.  it's more than likely that
>>gescom / disjecta gave her technical assistance to create the sounds,
>>and program her arrangments in the tracks.  not just being used as a
>>sample source - that's ridiculous!
>
>Funny how this is exactly what Bjork gets trashed all over this list
>for doing, while Chantal gets full props.
>
>Double standard?
>

i think it's because Chantal's music (or, rather, AE & disjecta's music
with chantal's blathering) is 100x more interesting than most things Bjork
has claimed to have done.

but, yeah.. double standard nonetheless.

at least chantal isn't some moron halfwit who prances around pretending to
be a fairy or mystic or some other annoying
from-the-darkwoode-forest-fantasy-type-thing.

that's got to count for something

- wells oliver / xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx.xxx / http://mute.simplenet.com