From DzrtMusic Sent Mon, Dec 7th 1998, 03:03
From DzrtMusic Sent Mon, Dec 7th 1998, 03:03
You really think that autoditaker "covers more sound"? Are you sure that you are not only saying this because autoditaker is more percussion and less melody? If you listen closely you'll find that Iaora Tahiti covers quite a bit of creative sound tweaking, and it's used quite well. I believe that both CD's are great works, but they are very different. Autoditaker is more about percussion, Iaora Tahiti is a totally about melody. Mabey you like Autoditaker more because you have a preference to percussion/electronic tweaks and clicks over melody? -allen > All this talk about MoM has lead me to jump into the conversation here . . . > I have Autoditacker and I. Tahiti . . .so i can only speak for those two. > But I prefer Autoditacker much more over I. T., i feel as though there's > much more going on without it being too busy or overindulgent. > > I feel as though Autod. covers more ground sonically, but at the same time, > it's not quite as "in your face" as I. T. I.T. is a great release, most > definitely, but the sounds seem to be underdeveloped and pasted in -- > whereas the sounds in Autod. seem to be twisted n turned n pulled into > quirky little grooves . . . > > "X-flies" is probably my favorite track . . . most mellow i think. Another > reason i prefer Autod. over I. T. . . . Autod. seems to have less harsh > melodies, more bubbly electronics. > > So those are my few cents . . I haven't heard anything released after > Autod., but would love to get ahold of Instrumentals on CD if ever possible > . . > > Also love the MoM support for Stereolab's Dots n Loops. > > Take care all . . . > > sean.