From Mantoid Sent Thu, Jun 10th 1999, 22:16
Well, it would have been t'anks, if I was contracting the work "thanks," which I wasn't; opting instead for the shortened "playing with tanks." But your analysis was most appropriate and pertinent to the content of the post. Vanessa *--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--* *--* "Master, I have done wrong. *--* *--* I will go to Malaysia and start a new life." *--* *--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--* On Thu, 10 Jun 1999 xxxxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx wrote: > In a message dated 6/10/99 2:53:29 PM Mountain Daylight Time, > xxxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx writes: > > > 'tanks, > > wouldn't that be "t'anks" instead of "'tanks".. afterall it's the H you're > replacing. Just trying to keep up that tight idm atmosphere with a little bit > of annoying grammar over analysis. The emphasis being more on the anal than > the ysis. > > Spank you, > Aaron >