From laerm Sent Wed, Oct 21st 1998, 17:50
From laerm Sent Wed, Oct 21st 1998, 17:50
On Wed, 21 Oct 1998, Shane Cantwell wrote:
> I'm led to ask: if the regression in quality from 11 to 12 to 13 is any
> indication, will 15 be random banging on the keys of a toy piano sequenced
> and repeated for 8 minutes? There's one listenable track on here, the
> remaining being poorly EQ'd, repetitive irritating nonsense, with low
> quality keyboard presets looped over dull loops. 11 and 12 at least put me
> to sleep, this just grates on me. (this coming from one of the people who
> made those MP3's on my web page...)
hmm...i've got one, and 9-12, and, well, i also think that one is a lot
better than the rest, but 10 and 11 really have their moments. does anyone
have them all? what're the rest like?
*
####
a disturbance in a system. ####
laerm. @voicenet.com ##:#
"People are ecstatic about getting into the mainstream. I think
it's a little bit stupid, since the mainstream is pretty muddy..."
Glenn Gould