(idm) randomized thoughts on idm, 'pi' and hollywood

From Alex Reynolds
Sent Tue, Apr 20th 1999, 07:00

watched pi a few weekends ago with my fifteen-year old brother. he liked
the choice of music, but didn't like much else about the film, calling it
weird, silly, pretentious. myself, i liked it better the first time around.

watching it again, i got the feeling i was in the standard-grade
independent film festival, where the artiste/director repeatedly cuts to
odd-angle, poorly-lit shots and grainy film to divert your attention from
the overacting. even with the music, the atmosphere was lost on videotape.

now whenever i drive my brother anywhere and i'm playing any electronic
music in the car, he puts his index finger to his temple and starts making
drilling noises. it's embarassing. it's irritating.

i get concerned when my sibling comes back from watching 'the matrix' and
says he now likes techno, having heard propellerheads, rob zombie, and
prodigy. i also feel like exercising elder-monkey privileges and smacking
him upside the head.

the youth of today starve for movie soundtracks with quality electronic
music -- idm needs better role models in the cinematic community.

'pi' is an okay flick, but i prefer 'clockwork orange' as electronic
music's ambassador to the silver screen. with a kubrick piece, at least the
pretension and elitism can be rationalized.

where is our generation's wendy carlos?

__________________________________________________________________________
Alex Reynolds                                     E xxxxxxxx@xxx.xxxxx.xxx
UPenn : SAS Computing : Biology Dist Support             V +1 215 573 2818
http://www.sas.upenn.edu/biology/                        F +1 215 898 8780
'The central message of Buddhism is not "every man for himself"!' -- Wanda