From Chad Mossholder Sent Fri, Jul 9th 1999, 17:37
I prefer to use a time moniker instead. > -----Original Message----- > From: Philip Sherburne [SMTP:xxxxxx@xxx.xxx] > Sent: Friday, July 09, 1999 9:40 AM > To: 'xxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx' > Subject: (idm) re: exp. time sigs > > my problem with 3/4: > it never fails to remind me of waltzes. > > i hate waltzes. > > 6/8, now: there's a time signature i'm ok with. > > > >Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 17:03:09 +0100 > >From: martin <xxxxxx.xxxx@xxxxxx-xxxx.xx.xx> > >Subject: Re: (idm) experimental time signatures > > >i think that 3/4 is a criminally underused time signature in modern > >(electronic) music, or using 8th note triplets in either 3/4 or 4/4 > >i feel it has a kind of in built-groove which is sadly lacking in a > >lot of electronic stuff...its not too experimental..but wtf...