RE: (idm) re: exp. time sigs

From Chad Mossholder
Sent Fri, Jul 9th 1999, 17:37

I prefer to use a time moniker instead.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:        Philip Sherburne [SMTP:xxxxxx@xxx.xxx]
> Sent:        Friday, July 09, 1999 9:40 AM
> To:        'xxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx'
> Subject:        (idm) re: exp. time sigs
> 
> my problem with 3/4:
> it never fails to remind me of waltzes.
> 
> i hate waltzes.
> 
> 6/8, now:  there's a time signature i'm ok with.
> 
> 
> >Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 17:03:09 +0100
> >From: martin <xxxxxx.xxxx@xxxxxx-xxxx.xx.xx>
> >Subject: Re: (idm) experimental time signatures
> 
> >i think that 3/4 is a criminally underused time signature in modern
> >(electronic) music, or using 8th note triplets in either 3/4 or 4/4
> >i feel it has a kind of in built-groove which is sadly lacking in a
> >lot of electronic stuff...its not too experimental..but wtf...