From Et Pharmacistic Paradoxia Sent Thu, Sep 3rd 1998, 21:32
From Et Pharmacistic Paradoxia Sent Thu, Sep 3rd 1998, 21:32
Seems like the differences in the movement of the two needles might cause problems. Maybe you could offset the cue points of the two grooves and just use two tonearms. This brings up another of my brilliantly pointless questions: Has anyone ever dj'd a setup that has two tonearms playing one record such that you could crossfade back to the quarternote that "just happened" and do some slapback echo business? Obviously this is the same as having two copies of the record and two turntables, but I had to ask, 'k? No stone left unturned, solenoid On Thu, 3 Sep 1998, Alex Reynolds wrote: > That sounds almost like you're describing some sort of error correction on > a piece of vinyl... > > Such a two-tracked record could be played on a deck with a two-needle arm, > the distance between needle tips equalling the distance between groove > valleys. The advanced deck would be less susceptible to bumps *and* able to > take the two signals and subtract noise from either, like a pair of > chromosomes. Something like that could be "complete without surface > noise"... > > :: Alex > > >My question is: has anyone made a record with two parallel grooves that > >spiral inward between each other that have different tracks with the same > >bpm that have the their cue points line up, such that if the needle skips > >to the other track (the one in parallel, not one groove ahead or behind) > >it is still in time and in sync? Whew! > > __________________________________________________________________________ > Alex Reynolds Distributed Support Specialist > Department of Biology School of Arts & Sciences Computing > University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA > email:xxxxxxxx@xxx.xxxxx.xxx phone:215.573.2818 > > > xxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx <------+