From Simon Walley Sent Fri, Jul 10th 1998, 09:36
From Simon Walley Sent Fri, Jul 10th 1998, 09:36
>From: "GamePrg." <xxx@xxxxxx.xxxxx.xxx> >Subject: Re: (idm) drill & bass Re: it takes the physical.... > > >why should we call it drill'n'bass.. Drill'n'bass isn't a sustaining genre - it's a novelty IMO. The interesting stuff will happen when the techniques and ethos (basically fuck around with as much of the break and sounds as possible) cross-breeds into other stuff. This is happening already - a good example IMO is that Ae Certificate 18 remix. >it caused everyone to corrolate the >next wave of big hits as being drill'n'bass tracks, and suddenly the wave= >became reality and now the wave has crashed and the ocean is calm again. Been reading a bit too much _Solaris_? >no way man.. there's only a few IDM hits that aren't organic, and those a= >re >mostly autechre tracks, that sound machinery clashing together. The new stuff sounds pretty organic to me - still with that Ae coldness and kind of clinical outlook but with the sounds they're using. Sorry - that wasn't a sentence. How was Sprawl then with Mike P. and Jega? I was going to go but started caning _Goldeneye_ and then played my Main Street records and then couldn't be arsed. || [CiM] || xxx_@xxxxxxx.xxx || - ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com