Re: [AH] 2.0000024 MHz Top Octave Source Oscillator blown

From Kenny Balys
Sent Wed, Apr 18th 2018, 16:31

Thanks Sam.

It looks like, from the comments I am getting, that, in the near/long 
run, I need to replace the bad inductor to have a stable instrument.

In the short term, I am building a little CMOS oscillator on Veroboard 
so I can get recording. Will just have to retune constantly.

The inductor in the String Performer looks like a square metal can with 
a turny bit recessed inside. You either have to drop the mother board or 
remove the top 3 keys to get to it.

I like the Arp Omni inductor better as it can be screwed from the side.

Still, the very inaccessibility of the master oscillator in the String 
Performer speaks to its stability.

I mean, I never even knew it was there until it broke!


On 18.04.18 15:50 , Sam Mims wrote:
> The Arp Omni uses a variable inductor as part of the tuning circuit for
> the oscillator; I assume the String Performer does the same.  Here's a
> picture of the Arp part, for whatever it's worth:
>
> https://syntaur.com/Items.php?Item=2729
>
> Sam Mims
>
> Syntaur
>
>
>
>
> On 4/18/2018 9:42 AM, Kenny Balys wrote:
>>
>> My Hohner String Performer lost tuning right at the beginning of a
>> recording session yesterday :(
>>
>> I opened it up and the suspect part is a variable inductor:
>>
>> Hohner part L1= BV Nr 005837
>>
>> I have tracked this part down to a company called Amidon in Germany.
>> It has the following specifications:
>>
>> Amidon BV Nr 005837, colour code Black, Green, Brown, 5 MHz response,
>> L = 19.6 uH, Q=120 at 1MHz, Anschluß an Stift A:5 E:4, 27 Euros price
>>
>> Neato. I don't understand any of this.
>>
>> If I want to get going now, can I not just bang together a 2MHz
>> oscillator with CMOS gates?
>>
>> If anyone understands these things, why would a master oscillator be
>> inductor based? What benefit is it?
>>
>> This thing feeds the 50240 Top Octave divider.
>>
>> I checked my Crumar and it's master oscillator also sports an inductor.
>>
>> The old PAIA stuff seems to mostly use CMOS gate based master
>> oscillators so at least there is
>>
>> So where is the question?
>>
>> Ok.... has anyone replaced an inductor based master oscillator with a
>> CMOS gate based one on a top octave divider based synth. I am shortly
>> to do just that (as a band aid)... is this nuts?
>