(idm) Re: Sir Menelik, Doc Oc, Freaky hip-hop

From lwtcdi
Sent Wed, Feb 25th 1998, 02:31

> This leads me to a question: are hip-hop fans (not the
> critics) receptive to the weirder stuff like Dr. Octagon, Sir Menelik and
> the like? Some of this stuff is brilliant and it would be ashamed to have it
> die from lack of support.

Yeah, I think the hip-hop heads are into it, after all Kool Keith does
have a pretty strong background with Ultramagnetic MCs (now reformed)
and everything (even if he is down with the Prodigy and vice versa).
Can't speak for Menelik, 'cos I haven't heard any, but hoping to pick
something up when cash allows. I haven't got my ear to the ground as far
the hip-hop scene is concerned, but I know I appreciate good lyrical
skill that makes the fairly static hip-hop beats come alive, and of
course vice versa. Both at once is pure bliss, and this is the stuff I
look out for.

Dr. Octagon has skills and I don't agree with the person who was dissing
him. I guess his style isn't for everyone, but he makes me laugh. I
don't think Automator's beats are totally amazing, and IMO they wouldn't
be that much with Keith. I like crafted lyrics that are nice and off the
wall. Same goes for Co-Flow on that count - I love Funcrusher Plus
although that's all I've heard, but this stuff really connects. That's
what I love about good hip-hop just the way the language is pushed to
the front, and that's why the r&b stuff is so lame. Usually, the sparser
the production better, for me anyway. It's all about experimenting
within the form with both beats and lyrics. And the r&b heads should
remember that you can have a chorus without singing...

gb. 
-- 
/TheW   i  http://www.homeusers.prestel.co.uk/lwtcdi/all/4-16.htm
f   o L D  
o dlr WTC  "The Truth About 'Choose Your Own Adventure' Novels"