From Frank Sci Sent Tue, Feb 24th 1998, 22:44
From Frank Sci Sent Tue, Feb 24th 1998, 22:44
>bla bla. so predictable. If it is so predictable, then why ask the question? >it's just that this record is so cool (except >track b1 that is) at both speeds that i was wondering how the artist(s) >meant it to be. I don't doubt that, but as an artist myself, I can tell you that most labels allow some creative license in regards to label design... if it wasn't listed, then generally the artists have PRECONCEIVED the concept that the tempo wasn't important. They may have written it at xxx bpm, but since the final manifestation of their music was going to be this medium, many people write with that final stage in mind. o0o[qiB.]o0o btw- as I'm sure you already know, a record that can sound sik at both speeds is far and few between... couple that with the fact the rpm setting wasn't listed (also something that rarely happens) and your betting against the odds that it wasn't intentional...