From Graham Voice Sent Tue, May 25th 1999, 16:57
Talking about messed up record speeds I was tempted the other day by a very interesting item. Basically someone had taken an old Beach Boys track (Good Vibrations if memory serves) and played it at 1 rpm on a specially adapted turntable. The resultant "noise" was then released as a CD album, sounding a bit like Pee Namlook no doubt. (Awaiting Anti-Fax flames as we speak) Question - The Two Lone Swordsmen mix of Ganger's Trilogy, 33 or 45? Graham > -----Original Message----- > From: martin wood [SMTP:xxxxxx.xxxx@xxxxxx-xxxx.xx.xx] > Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 1999 4:55 PM > To: talking in circles > Subject: Re: (idm) vinyl > > definitely, music is subjective anyway....im looking forward to the > integration > of java into embedded systems, so that you can write your own > controller for > digital (and analogue as well, i spose) devices...being able to tweak > the > cd-players error correction algorithm has got to be a good thing... > sorry ....going off on one a bit.... > > david turgeon wrote: > > > > its a shame that record players dont all come with a 25 rpm mode > or > > > something, cos loads of stuff sounds much better slow...like > in-sync : the > > > calling....absolutely amazing at 33...(cheers graham) > > > > i've seen an old turntable that came with 16 rpm & (obviously) 78 > rpm > > switches, as well as the usual 33/45 combo. however, its sound is > > pretty damn crappy & the thing cannot really used for anything other > > than noise, so i don't know if there's specific models which can > still > > be used today. however, it makes some records sound quite > > outerworldish. an old womack & womack 45, for example, can sound > quite > > dark & menacing at 16 rpm. > > > > & as for 78, that's instant drum n bass or instant hardcore for ya. > > > > i'm beginning to think that no one should put the "right" bpm on > > abstract electronic records. it's always so subject to > interpretation. > > plus it's like having 2 records in one (or 4 if you have the 16/78 > > switch). > > > > -- > > david turgeon at http://www.notype.com