Re: (idm) Re: (313) Re:newKraftwerkVSold/Atkins' opinion

From Andrew Duke Cognition
Sent Wed, Feb 24th 1999, 21:36

geez, that last email wasn't meant for anybody else but laerm. ugh!

Cognition Audioworks wrote:

> you know i'd be happy with the money a stripper made. just think of
> it, i could get a real URL instead of all this /~ business, i could get some
> help in to take the stress out of my life, i could, hey, i could buy a new
> computer and then life sould be cheery beyond compare. oh, to be astripper.
> that would be the life. ;) but then again, stripping can be artistic in
> certain ways.
> is uppose, and my dayjob is akin to working at macdonald's. okay enough
> talk about dayjobs. must get ready to do the show tonight, that's much more
> fuin. andrew :)
>
> laerm wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 24 Feb 1999, Cognition Audioworks wrote:
> >
> > > is just a dayjob to him and he doesn't want to be defined by it.  i can
> > > certainly see why--if you knew what my "dayjob" was and saw how far
> > > removed from music/art/creativity it was, you would understand why i am
> > > annoyed by people in my life (friends, family, etc)  who think all i do
> > > is work at my dayjob (when the most important part of my life is the
> > > music)  and say "andrew are you going to work at your dayjob for the
> > > rest of your life" as if that's all i'm doing. urgh. anyway, .
> >
> > andrew, no offense, but for as often as you yap about your "dayjob" but
> > never mention it, the only logical assumption for us is that you're a
> > stripper. ;)
> >
> >    *
> >                                                                       ####
> > a disturbance in a system.                                            ####
> > laerm. @voicenet.com                                                  ##:#
> >                Denn die einen sind im Dunkeln/Und die andern sind im Licht
> >             Und man sieht nur die im Lichte/Die im Dunkeln sieht man nicht
> >
> > icq: 5562209