Re: [AH] Behringer announces OB-Xa clone project

From Jason Proctor
Sent Thu, Jan 24th 2019, 02:52

if you want a modern reliable (6 voice) OB-X clone then get an OB-6.

if you want a modern reliable OB-Xa/8 clone then the Behringer is the
only option.

they ain't the same synth by a long mile.


On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 6:49 PM Royce Lee <xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
>
> Good advice. Kinda fugly.
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 8:12 PM Jonathan Lippard <xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx wro=
te:
>>
>> I got to be at the official release thingy for the Two Voice reissue, I =
remember Tom Oberheim (slight paraphrase, slightly flip) at one point sayin=
g "People ask about whether the new SEMs sound different than the old ones,=
 yes they do--none of the originals sounded like each other either."
>>
>>
>> My perspective on the Behringer clones is if they get you into the ballp=
ark of a specific sound (and, yes, the Mini clone gets you 80% percent of "=
that" sound), they're worth considering unless you have a real fetish for o=
wning The Actual Thing. Spoken from the perspective of someone who has owne=
d an OB-8 that's now an OB-7 because I cannot afford to take it to a tech. =
(And, of course, I don't trust my soldering skills when vintage gear. Let's=
 not accidentally double the eventual repair bill...)
>>
>>
>> That said, regarding the Xa clone in particular...I'd honestly encourage=
 people to find an OB-6 instead and get an Oberheim-style polysynth Tom him=
self had a hand in. It's not like you're spending Moog One money on that on=
e.
>>
>>
>> -Jonathan
>>
>> On January 23, 2019 at 4:30 PM Jeffrey Needham <xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.=
com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> And probably more to his point (my bad for reading too fast) is that the=
 organic nature of old gear is that nothing was really ever in spec and hav=
ing been built with 10% parts originally, nothing would be voice to voice i=
dentical. An OBX-a voice card has a lot of parts. An Xpander or Polaris has=
 2 CEMs, the Matrix 1000 is one CEM/voice.
>>
>> Modern, reliable manufacturing of poly-synths is a mixed bag, but so is =
spending more than 20% of your time maintaining old, gorgeous-sounding crap
>>
>>
>> Jeffrey Needham
>> Fabrix Analytix
>> (408) 394 5116
>>
>>
>> On Jan 23, 2019, at 12:13 PM, Andrew Scheidler < xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> wro=
te:
>>
>> As long as it has the "Jump" patch.
>>
>> Drew
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 23, 2019, Jeffrey Needham < xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=
x.com> wrote:
>>
>> 1++
>>
>> Often one that won=E2=80=99t tune might be the tune bus and/orflakey tri=
mpots. Once I replaced some TTL bus drivers and the trimpots, it was solid =
and tuned very fast. Trimpot replacement is tedious and potentially damagin=
g, so only do it where you have to.
>>
>> Refurbished rails are also an excellent investment.
>>
>> I hope they voice the voice summing op-amps. It matters.
>> I suspect this is a wave-soldered SMT gig, so no post-rolling.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jeffrey Needham
>> Fabrix Analytix
>> (408) 394 5116
>>
>>
>> On Jan 23, 2019, at 5:46 AM, Florian Anwander < xxxxxxxxx@xxxx-xxxxxx.xx=
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>>
>> Am 23.01.2019 um 04:49 schrieb Tristan:
>>
>> I think that part of the wild excitement of the OB-Xa is that the voices=
 tend to be a bit out of tune with
>>
>> each other
>>
>> As a owner of a well adjusted OB-Xa,  I cannot really agree.
>>
>> Florian
>>
>> --
>> http://www.florian-anwander.de
>>
>>
>>