Plaid (was: Re: (idm) Re: idm V1 #1332)

From Che
Sent Fri, Oct 31st 1997, 17:19

On Fri, 31 Oct 1997, Philip Hugh Sherburne wrote:

> unfortunately, i think my post is at cross-purposes to itself, because
> while i really want to pre-empt a long, drawn out, go-nowhere quasidebate
> about gender roles & IDM... i also am having a really, really, really hard
> time resisting slagging the utter fucking inanity of the above statement.

What was inane about it?  It's a true statement, based on questions to & 
observations of women I know.  Poll women you know, and see if you don't 
get similar results.

> i'm not denying that there are, sociologically speaking, gender differences
> at issue in music habits.  i work at a record store, and so i see first
> hand that men are a vast majority of music-buyers in general (simon
> reynolds chalks it up to anal-retentiveness, which is somehow supposed to
> be a male tendency, at least in a patriarchal society).  

I for one am glad there are diffences between the male & female of the 
species.

> HOWEVER, the way
> you frame your statement does *not* sound like an objective sociological
> observation--it comes across much more like an utterly derisive
> condemnation.  and it's really not too cool.  (by the way, interesting how
> "commercial sellout" becomes a gendered term, by its association to the
> "feminine" nature of music with vocals.)

I'm not dissing women, I'm dissing Plaid.  Of course it was framed in 
such a way to piss people off.  I like seeing who can argue with passion, 
and who degenerates into unfocused vitriol.  You've done a good job of 
fusing logic with emotion, BTW.

Who knows why Plaid chose to incorporate vocals?  Maybe it's pure 
artistry, maybe it's pure calculated commercialism.  The guy I responded 
to threw out one extreme, I threw out the other.  The truth probably lies 
somewhere in the middle.

I prefer IDM without vocals because vocals tend to either force a certain 
emotional state and level of attention (if there are lyrics), or just 
come across as inane (if they're the "oooh, yeah, baby" sort that plague 
house & drum&bass).  For whatever reason, I can actually enjoy Bjork's 
voice if the music's good, but, I have to be in a certain mood to 
listen.  Instrumental IDM is much more open-ended emotionally.

Of course, there are weird exceptions (contradiction is my middle name).  
Take "Long Road" by Funki Porcini.  In the middle of this moody piece he 
throws in this utterly cliched "I'll take you higher" sample, several 
times & out of rhythm.  It has a really bizarre effect on me and for some 
reason I find it fucking brilliant.  When Omni Trio uses similar diva 
samples, I'm just pissed off. Go figure.

Che

PS Philip Hugh: Why so fucking lazy about typing a meaningful Subject: line?