Re: Re[2]: (idm) RE: AE in Vancouver

From ninphil
Sent Thu, Aug 6th 1998, 22:56

>Well, I guess the point is keeping it interesting for them is not
>     necessarily the same as keeping us involved...  for a band to be that
>     disregarding of the desires of their audience is pretty  off-putting,
>     if you ask me.  But it just goes to show why a live techno act is not
>     treated the same as a live band.  At any rate, it's not that I want my
>     needs pandered to per se, I'd just like to be given some respect as a
>     fan and be met 50/50.  When they do what they do live, it's more like
>     95/5.  And yes it may be
I don't get this complaint...you own the records rght? So you can listen 
to those any day...personally watching a show of stuff I've never heard 
before is more interesting...not less..."keeping it interesting for 
themselves"...that's the best sign . Any artist that persues their own 
vision and invites a live audience along with them is fine by me. Don't 
be scared...live bands that jam  and never play a song the same way once 
are the ones who are famous for their live sets...not old wankers who 
cane the same old hits the same old way..
xxxoooo
ninja phil

stealthy not wealthy