From lwtcdi Sent Mon, Oct 20th 1997, 13:56
From lwtcdi Sent Mon, Oct 20th 1997, 13:56
>> >There is a legitimate contrast between Orbital and, say, AFX. Orbital's >> >music is often (though not always) not as complex, Certainly RDJs latest HAB style stuff is a lot more complex than Orbital have ever been. >> > and they don't really >> >"mess around" as much, not really taking as many chances. But ultimately, this is what has made their music boring over the years. AFX has taken a fair share of chances and I believe that it's only now that they're really paying off. Come To Daddy is nothing special, although there are some good tracks on the different formats, but the Richard D James album is where Aphex shows the rest of the IDM lot how an LP is really done. The whole LP has a totally indivualistic feel, and the tracks consecutively, are like mini-detonations (bar the last one, where the sillyness goes to his head a bit). >> > But despite >> >this, I believe they have something AFX doesn't have. We all know AFX's >> >purported attitude towards his music, and frankly, it shows, brilliant >> >though it is. I agree it has shown in the past, and in Come To Daddy (Pappy Mix), but I thing the RDJ album trancends it's sillyness and becomes something utterly different after you've heard it a few times. It is not gimmicky, it's just great original music which justifies the hype. >> >But there is somthing to be said for the "soul" of a >> >piece of music, and Orbital has it in spades. >> >> I'd have to agree to an extent. The only RDJ I own is ICBYD, and while I >> like it, it's not an album I really feel. Maybe that album is an anomaly, >> but much IDMish musik has a tendency to be overly intellectualized, and in >> the process it leaves behind emotional content and a sweet >> simplicity/directness. For starters, I don't really believe all this crap about music having soul. This may offend some people, but the only things that matter are diversity and originality. This is what forms so called emotion or soul in music (for me). When artists excel at these two, the music becomes soulful. It's certainly not some kind of magical force or channel of emotions into music or anything like that... >> Not that there's anything wrong with insane Sqpshr >> percussion--but sometimes I like the relative simplicity of a well produced >> "formulaic" jungle track, like a Goldie or a No U-Turn. I kind of know what you mean. I tend to prefer more straight ahead jungle most of the time, compared to Mr Jenkisons stuff (although not the particular artists you mention), but only because his albums are so disjointed. Both 'Feed Me..' and 'Hard Normal Daddy' are good albums, but neither begins to sound right as an LP until you've heard it a great many times (something which takes a while, as they are not LPs I for one, want to listen to that often). But then Squarepusher is working within the album environment a great deal more than most 'proper' jungle artists and thus tends to expose a common problem that has not yet been satisfactorily dealt with within jungle. That is, how to make this music work in an album format. I think, to a certain extent, IDM is one of the few dance based genres to have produced good albums. House music has not produced very many amazing albums, and likewise neither has a lot of techno (although techno/IDM seem to overlap quite a lot). The best LP music is usually that which has it's roots in one genre but is not afraid to explore others or create totally new ones. > I really like the >> Autechre i have because their fractured melodies and repetitive beats touch >> me in a way mu-ziq's banal synth thingies don't (not that I don't like them, >> they're just obviously cheesy and seem a counterpoint to his drums rather >> than anything that could stand alone, plus they get sickening after too long >> a sitting). Totally agree on this point. Autechre music, despite the harshness of some of the sounds, is constructed in such a way as to be unobtrousive and rarely grates on the ears. Mike P's synths really grate a lot nowadays, and I still think he, in some ways, is a lot like Orbital in that nothing he has produced since Tango N Vectif (for them, the Brown Album) has really been any good. Orbital's Brown Album (for me) is their crowning glory, but I think it differs for people depending on which LP they first heard by them (or Mike P). Once you have heard 'their sound' (Orbital, Mike P and others) any subsequent LPs that do not stray massively from the formula tend to sound so very tired and staid, and you always want to turn them off before they reach their conclusion. Autechre rarely have me doing this, but I can't really say for sure why this is, because their 'sound' hasn't progressed that much further than these artists (although the progression in each LP is distinctly audiable). >> I like Orbital-maybe I have a soft spot because they were an >> early techno exposure for me, * >> but their melody, their simplicity sometimes >> just works for me. * This is what I mean. I think it depends on when you were exposed to their sound and under what circumstances. >This is quite an odd opinion you have. AFX is my favorite because I find >his music so emotional. Listen to pancake lizard, hedphelym. If you have >i care, though, and can't feel it, we must have two very different >psychologies. My opinion on all this is probably somewhere inbetween. I Care Because You Do doesn't work for me as an album, but some of the tracks on it - the first couple, alberto balsalm and a few others - are excellent. I think the problem here is the way he uses old and new tracks together on one LP. Come On You Slags and Start As You Mean To Go On are decent enough clanging techno things but don't (IMO) belong on this LP. They are too old and seem stuck in his 'old' (and to me, fairly boring) ravey hardcore-techno sound of the Digeridoo/Classics era. Likewise the final track, Mookid, is basically the same droneathon he uses to conclude the Surfing On Sine Waves, which just ends up being unimaginative. > I've always thought that surfing on sine waves was his > coldest album. It's also his most straight ahead. Straight ahead as in danceable, I suppose, but there's some fucked up shit on this album. Listened to this today for the first time in a while and loved it. Very original in it's field of danceable techno... > I doubt that AFX doesn't care about his music. I don't think he ever said > he doesn't, either. Hates live shows, putting together albums, hates > having to do these things in order to make a living, maybe. I'd have to agree here. He says that making music is a chore, but surely that's because he wants to make music that he likes and that lives up to his expectations. Making boring simplistic music would be less of a chore than the more complex stuff he is doing now. Plus, all in all, this is load of interview bullshit anyway... > The exact examples you 2 bring up: orbital, goldie- these are 2 examples > I'd use to typify soulless music. Nothing but agreement here too. Same for the No U-Turn posse. People on this list have been praising the Torque compilation over what they've heard of Roni Size's output (probably just New Forms, which is a shame as the man and the Reprazent crew have done so much more). I think Roni's output has been nothing if not versatile. His music is fairly typical of jungle in it's sub-genres, but he innovates in each one, and every track he makes does not sound the same. He does a wide variety of styles extremely well, and I think this is his strongpoint, whereas No U-Turn just give people one sound to latch on to, and a very very very formulaic one at that (although some tracks are absolutely wicked (Technology and the remix, and that thing off prototype years called Locust). Torque as an album I think it is absolutely unremittingly boring. I heard the of it mix CD and after 45 minutes I just wanted to die. This is probably the desired effect, but I have never much cared for music that tries to pummel you into submission just for the sake of it (inc industrial stuff). I think all this 'hide behind the sofa, here comes a hoover noise' jungle has to stop and move on, and the sooner the better. There's some great techno-esque jungle coming out (DJ Krust's stuff and Swifts forthcoming tune) that isn't at all formula - I just wish there was more of it... > When your style sounds so much like > anybody else's, or even artists own past work, as I was trying to say at the beginning... > at least to me, whatever gut the music has seems > insincere. Yeah, exactly. This is what sums up what I was saying about the RDJ album. It's wicked because the music is almost entirely his own. If you've heard a sound before it does tend to detract from the soul/emotion or whatever you want to call it, of the music. > They did what they think they're supposed to do to make a > track with some feeling rather than just making the track and letting the > feeling take care of itself. Again, spot on. This example sounds to me like what Mike P, Autechre, No-U Turn etc do, and not Autechre, some of RDJs work and Roni Size and crew. But I suppose this is just another way of trying to justify the music I like. Either way, it's what I feel about the music... Um, bit of a rambler this post. Hope anyone who read it managed to get some sense out of it... Gb.