Re: (idm) Re: IDM formulas?

From Otto Koppius
Sent Fri, Oct 17th 1997, 12:47

-0 wrote:

> Same shit in the end, wicked beats most important seems like. More 
> focus on beat then on melody we'd all tend to agree no?

I wish it were different tho'...
 
> If it's a good loop, let it run forever I say. 

Heh :)
I once made an Ae tape with "Gnit" looped on the A-side and "Overand" 
looped on the B-side. Mesmerizing is the appropriate word here...

> A loop  ain't necessarily bad all the time, but it wouldn't be progress (issue 
> at hand)

Progress can basically be achieved in two ways: by doing something 
that throws away all rules and standards, ending up as something 
entirely new ("lateral" progress) or by staying within a certain 
framework and ending up as a further refinement of a current style 
("transversal" progress). RDJ would be an example of the former 
category, the Basic Channel sound an example of the latter. The same 
with loopiness: it might not be groundbreaking anymore, but there is 
still progress possible (and being made).

> Yes, part of the equation, but I just wanted to focus on RDJ's SAW#1 
> as the place where the formula all came together for what we call IDM. 

...as one of the places where the formula...
There are more facets to this thing we call IDM than just RDJ....

Otto, resident recalcitrant