RE: (idm) V/Vm statement (was RE: (idm) Skam / Mask irony)

From martin burbridge
Sent Wed, Jan 6th 1999, 17:12

xxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx wrote:

> And I hear much mentin of V/Vm.  They are working
> towards another Makant mistake, releasing way too much too often.
> They have
> like eight 7"ers coming out in January and in an email from them they said
> they have 50 planned 7"ers for 99.  They will burn out quick if
> you ask me.

comparing v/vm to markant on the basis that they both release lots of ltd
editions is an even bigger mistake. shouldn't the sound come somewhere ahead
of quantity pressed? markant is no good because the only thing going for
those records is their scarcity. is anyone really certain he's just not
re-releasing the same tracks in a different order? mind you w/ boc at the
pinnacle of '98 i guess excitement isn't really a necessity any more.
pleasant and safe is in, and v/vm are refreshingly anti-pleasant and
entertainingly erratic. lee perry released 100 7" singles for one label,
trojan's upsetter imprint, in less than 3 years at the end of the 60's and
he was stilly looking pretty lively last year, proving that you can't have
too much of a good thing.

> Besides, I HATE 7"ers.

maybe in 30 years you'll be able to buy 'em all on a cd box set at tower.
i'd wait if i were you.

disclaimer:
i know everyone is probably sick of this thread, and i'm more or less
rephrasing the v/vm statement, but i composed most of this last night and
was too lazy to send it. i just wanted to show that not everyone on idm
judges music by the quantity, format, rarity or perceived monetary value of
releases.

-martin