Re: (idm) why mask should be bootlegged

From K J Pocock
Sent Tue, Jan 5th 1999, 23:42

Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 10:11:16 -0500 (EST)
From: Marc 3 Poirier <xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx.xxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: (idm) why mask should be bootlegged

>I did this because I thought that the music on these was really great
>(well, maybe not side 2 of MASK 4) & that people interested in it
>should be able to hear it (& I thought that that was why people started
>record labels & put out music in the first place).

As a musician and partner in a new small label I can't see any argument for
bootlegging - period.  We've just released our first album by DELPH and have
had great difficulties in sorting out distribution (one of our distributors
recently went bust -nothing to do with us: ) ) so we can't always get our
records where we want them.  We'd love to have them in every store worldwide
but it just doesn't work that way for our size of operation.  Yes we do mail
order but not everybody wants to buy like that.

We run on an extremely tight budget and I mean extremely... :) Basically we
do what we do for the love of the music and that's it - to see your hard
work being ripped off by a bootlegger whether it be MP3, CD duplication or
whatever...sorry it doesn't wash.

If you're going to do it do it properly and have respect for the music, the
fans and the artists.

Thanks for listening.

Kevin

Blue Pool records: www.bluepool.demon.co.uk
Delph: www.bluepool.demon.co.uk/delph