From cognition Sent Tue, Sep 21st 1999, 04:18
From cognition Sent Tue, Sep 21st 1999, 04:18
for interest's sake: the two "house" artists cited by pole, scion, vainqueur, and substance (ie. german minimalists from the chain reaction/basic channel/kiff sm camp) as being the most innovative, in their minds, are... the uk's herbert and detroit's theo parrish. in fact, they didn't actually specify these as their favorite "house" artists, but simply as their favorite *artists* that they're currently diggin' (though most would say herbert and theo parrish are doing "house"). andrew duke :) blipvert wrote: > I'm not sure that you are making a strong argument for the ease or > difficulty of writing a house track. House tracks are accessible but they > are not pop songs. Good house tracks are accessible, usualy soulful > or funky and often trippy or experimental without ever falling into > a trap of being chin-scratching music for music listeners. House > music is first and foremost about a vibe. You can't think your way into > it though it might be impressive from a production or technical viewpoint. > >From a DJs perspective, house music is some of the more difficult music > to mix. It is difficult to conceal mistakes in beat matching during mixes > because all of the quarter notes are marked with kick drums. Mistakes > in beat matching sound like flams or stutters of beats and are very apparent. > House music is not accessible because it is simple and the history and present > > of house music is not simple. It is almost spiritual, there is no point in me > trying to describe it. > House music is the foundation of idm, d & b and blah, blah blah. > Or at least those genres would not exist without house music getting the whole > > thing going. Idm would not exist without DJs and clubs and parties > creating a possibility of dance music that you listen to outside > of a dance music enxironment. If you guys can even ponder the > interest of house music or whether or not house music is > interesting, you realy should get out from behind the computer and go > out to a party or a club, live a little and see why the music that you > discuss exists in the first place. > > xxxxx@xx.xxxxxx.xxx wrote: > > > On 09/20/99 16:15:45 you wrote: > > > > > >On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Irene McC wrote: > > > > > >> Recently I find myself drifting more and more towards what might > > >> be classified as deep house, especially the more melodic end of > > >> the IDM spectrum rather than power drills and washing mashines. > > > > > >i think tetsu inoue says in the urbansounds interview something about > > >anyone can make weird, fucked-up sounding music, the harder thing to do is > > >make it accessible. > > > > I'm not really sure Tetsuo had that one nailed down right. After writing > > D&B and techno stuff for years, I did a little expirement last year > > about this time: try and write some pop songs. I got a female > > vocalist fot the tracks and everything. I actually found it a little > > bit easier to do. Most accessible music relies on very predictable ] > > formulas which are pretty easy to pick up. I think the only real > > challenge,at least for me, was not not to fuck with the sound. > > > > Rob > > listening to some kick ass Xyn tracks > > > > component records > > http://www.mindstorm.com/component > > codec-fragments coming soon! -- Cognition/Andrew Duke's In The Mix mailto:xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xx http://techno.ca/cognition 1096 Queen St #123 Halifax NS Canada B3H 2R9