Re: waffles

From Sham Beam
Sent Thu, Oct 23rd 2014, 07:25

Damn, that's some premium glitching! Must be awesome, sold!

An artist could have a bigger audience if they provided multiple mixes 
based on the listeners preferences. Clark with slide guitar for country 
fans.




On 10/23/2014 6:22 PM, Esa Ruoho wrote:
> would you like the premium glitch package for the 16.99€ - guaranteed to
> glitch up all the tracks in the application!
>
>
> On 23 October 2014 10:20, Sham Beam <xxxx.xxxx@xxxxx.xxx
> <mailto:xxxx.xxxx@xxxxx.xxx>> wrote:
>
>     more glitches!!
>
>
>     On 10/23/2014 5:36 PM, Esa Ruoho wrote:
>
>         ahh, i see what you mean John - build your own tracks by artist xyz,
>         made to-order.
>         like a subway sandwich.
>         "i'll have 909 claps and a 606 rimshot, and a walking acoustic
>         bassline,
>         hold the glitches"
>
>
>         On 23 October 2014 09:33, John D. <xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx
>         <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx>
>         <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.__xx
>         <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx>>> wrote:
>
>              Might work. Maybe an artist could have an individual app.
>
>              I like my idea though. "Want some claps here? Pay just $.09!"
>
>                  nah, more like, you have an album, but to unlock extra
>             bonus
>                  tracks, you have to pay 0.99€ or so. and then they'd be
>             inside the
>                  app.
>
>
>                  On 23 October 2014 05:19, John D.
>             <xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx>
>                  <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.__xx
>             <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx>>> wrote:
>
>                      With sounds missing, like? It could be ambient
>             maybe unless
>                      you purchased the beats.
>
>                          there's that word "decent" right between "got" and
>                          "monetization".
>
>                          i wonder if an album app with in-app-purchases
>                 would make a dime
>
>                          ---
>                 http://lackluster.bandcamp.com
>                 http://lackluster.org
>                 http://esaruoho.tumblr.com
>                          iPhone: +358403703659 <tel:%2B358403703659>
>                 <tel:%2B358403703659>
>
>                              On 22 Oct 2014, at 23:52, Esa Juhani Ruoho
>                              <xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx
>                     <mailto:xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>
>                     <mailto:xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx
>                     <mailto:xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>>> wrote:
>
>                              so anyone think Best Fiends has got
>                     monetization or is it
>                              all an in-app-purchase rip-off?
>
>                              ---
>                     http://lackluster.bandcamp.com
>                     <http://lackluster.bandcamp.__com/
>                     <http://lackluster.bandcamp.com/>>
>                     http://lackluster.org <http://lackluster.org/>
>                     http://esaruoho.tumblr.com <http://esaruoho.tumblr.com/>
>                              iPhone: +358403703659 <tel:%2B358403703659>
>                     <tel:%2B358403703659>
>
>                                  On 22 Oct 2014, at 23:51, Jared Dunne
>                         <xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx <mailto:xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>
>                                  <mailto:xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx
>                         <mailto:xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>>> wrote:
>
>                                  Be well, my friend, Jon.
>
>                                  On Oct 22, 2014 3:49 PM, "Jon Sands"
>                         <xxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx <mailto:xxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>
>                                  <mailto:xxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx
>                         <mailto:xxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>>> wrote:
>
>                                      On 10/22/2014 3:31 PM, Jared Dunne
>                         wrote:
>
>
>                                          Oh, the beautiful human trait
>                         of deflection.
>
>
>                                      Nah, I think I just speak for the
>                         majority of this list
>                                      (and Zack summed it up well) that
>                         nobody is really
>                                      interested in wasting any more
>                         effort responding to the
>                                      extremely poor straw man you have
>                         repeatedly tried to
>                                      make. We'd rather talk about
>                         something interesting. I
>                                      think the moment you made the
>                         hilarious comparison of
>                                      physical objects to copyright, most
>                         of the people here
>                                      lost interest in you. It's ok
>                         though, I'm sure you'll
>                                      get some poor sap here soon willing
>                         to argue with you
>
>                                      --
>                                      Jon Sands
>                                      Fohdeesha Media
>                         http://fohdeesha.com/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     --
>     Sham Beam
>
>
>


-- 
Sham Beam