From David Bulog Sent Thu, Jan 4th 2018, 03:31
From David Bulog Sent Thu, Jan 4th 2018, 03:31
Thanks Ben =E2=80=94what about Roland SE-02 ? thats a really nice = machine. Studio electronics designed the analog portion but Roland took that and = then enhanced built it into the boutique form factor, along with = sequencer, digital sound card ) > On 4/01/2018, at 4:20 pm, Ben Bridges <xxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> wrote: >=20 > =3D=3D=3Dsorry, sending again as it got rejected=3D=3D=3D >=20 > I have compared multiple/different TT-303 mk1 with v1 and v2 as well = as > mk2 (that's confusing) >=20 > TT-303 (version 1) vs TT-303 (version 2) vs TT-303 mk2 (candy case), = and > just like TB-303s and all the other analogue clones they sound > different.=C3=82 No two I have had come through my studio have = sounded the > same, even the same models.=C3=82 I think this is down to the = analogue > components, whereas all the TBoutique and TB-Airas I have > played/tested/heard all sound the same to me. >=20 > There is a resonance pot that can be adjusted inside the TT-303 to = make > it squeal more or be more soft depending on your preference, (just = like > on the TB-303). >=20 > In regards to the original post, if Rick-Rolland could make an = analogue > synth they should have already done it.=C3=82 They could have easily = made an > all analogue sh-101, tb-303, tr-808 or tr-909 for next to nothing, but > they didn't because maybe they just don't know how to do it unless = they > outsource the job to someone else. (just my 303 cents) >=20 >=20 >=20 > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus >=20