From Lorne Hammond Sent Tue, Jan 16th 2018, 14:58
I agree, interface is physically unrelated. The speed of shifting = between 4 banks or 4 preselected user mods, and the row of sliders that = can be played while hitting the pads is not there. no to the sp-16/djs-1000 interface lorne=20 -----Original Message----- From: A. Horton [mailto:xxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx]=20 Sent: January-16-18 6:04 AM To: David Bulog <xxxx@xxxx.xx.xx> Cc: Lorne Hammond <xxxxxxxx@xxxx.xx>; skunk3 <xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>; AH = <xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> Subject: Re: [AH] SP-1200 boutique? Nope/. On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:39 PM, David Bulog <xxxx@xxxx.xx.xx> wrote: > That machine already exists take a look at SP-16 or DJS-1000 = =E2=80=94pretty=20 > much a modern day SP-1200 > http://www.mpc-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=3D42&t=3D183991 > http://www.mpc-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=3D42&t=3D180028 > > > On 16/01/2018, at 3:51 pm, Lorne Hammond <xxxxxxxx@xxxx.xx> wrote: > > I have been saying this to as many designers and engineers as I can.=20 > Its the interface of the sp-12 that is just as cool as teh crunch. > Lorne > > From: skunk3 [mailto:xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx] > Sent: January-15-18 12:03 PM > To: AH <xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> > Subject: [AH] SP-1200 boutique? > > Why hasn't anyone out there attempted to make a SP-1200 boutique or = clone? > The prices of these things second-hand is utterly outrageous and would = > it really be all that difficult to pull off nowadays? I want the same=20 > sound, same features, etc. Maybe a bit more sample time but not much. > >