From mehmet.ismail85 Sent Fri, Oct 16th 2015, 14:36
From mehmet.ismail85 Sent Fri, Oct 16th 2015, 14:36
Cheers, didn't realise I only sent it to you. What an amateur. Mem > On 16 Oct 2015, at 14:31, Zombiefly <xxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> wrote: >=20 > replying to mehmet's comment which came directly to me, not the list: >=20 > I read a bit about the making of the album - including an interview - > and though the concept may be tired, the voices are very real. I don't > think the sound bites are ill fitting, I think it's the music that is > ill fitting. The music does absolutely nothing to add to the > narrative. I suppose it's only interesting if you're interested in the > story that they are trying to tell but, it's not good enough to hold > my attention. It feels a bit like a university/college project and > you're right; there's not a lot said that hasn't been said before and > has been said and done better. Would rather watch a decent documentary > on YouTube. As far as just music goes, yeah, it's weak as fuck. >=20 > Mem >=20 >=20 > yeah, i agree its the music that's weak. i swear i heard the same > track 3 times throughout listening to the album. the vocals are so > weak, they can barely stand up. the music is poor. it's like an album > constructed out of gaseous farts with samples thrown in to somehow > give it a purpose. >=20 > 0/10 :) >=20 >> So tell me, is it better than Lexicon of Goods? --- | Esa Ruoho | +358403= 703659 | http://fi.linkedin.com/in/esaruoho | | http://lackluster.bandcamp.c= om | http://lackluster.org | http://esaruoho.tumblr.com | | http://twitter.c= om/esaruoho | http://facebook.com/LacklusterOfficial |