Re: [AH] digital oscillators & clocks

From Tristan
Sent Mon, Jun 4th 2018, 23:42

Hi Mike,

This issue was covered at length in a late 80s edition of Keyboard magazine along with tests and 
reviews of the sampler models available at that time. I should really scan it because I am not sure it is 
currently online anywhere. There was a mix of variable and fixed rate samplers in the late 80s so the 
transition happened around that time, although it was somewhat manufacturer specific. Off the op of my 
head:

Akai S612, S7x, S9x variable rate, S1x, S3x etc fixed rate.
Emu I, II, & III, Emax variable rate, Emax II, EIIIx later fixed rate
Ensoniq all fixed rate although Mirage acts more like variable rate
Roland all fixed rate

/Tristan

On Tue, Jun 5th, 2018 at 1:59 AM, Mike Perkowitz <xxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:

> hello, analog friends! since digital synthesis is now fair game here, I
> have some questions. it's my understanding that in the early digital era,
> sample playback tended to be done by using a clock to run through a buffer
> of samples, and you'd vary the pitch by varying the clock speed. if you
> have multiple voices, you'd presumably have multiple clocks, set for the
> pitch of each note you want to play, and you'd mix your voices in analog. I
> believe this was used for digital delay, synths like the PPG wave, and
> early samplers. right?
> 
> I believe later sample playback tended to use a fixed-rate clock, and pitch
> would be controlled, I'm guessing, via interpolation or removing samples.
> with a fixed clock, all your voices could be computed together and mixed
> digitally, and you could provide a single digital output. correct?
> 
> so my question is... when did that transition happen? and does anyone know
> which devices (samplers, especially) used which methods? also, how are
> various eurorack oscillators doing it?
>