From sge Sent Mon, May 10th 1999, 18:57
From sge Sent Mon, May 10th 1999, 18:57
what I was trying to say was that Not For Threes is light years ahead of the new BD singles, I agree that NFT itself is not an exceptional album but is 100 times better than that BD shite. sge -----Original Message----- From: daniel <xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> To: sge <xxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx> Cc: james r mcpherson <xxxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx>; IDM List <xxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> Date: 10 May 1999 05:47 Subject: Re: (idm) Babble on ... >On Fri, 7 May 1999, sge wrote: > >> absoulute crap, the worst I've heard so far by the once invincible BD. Not >> For Threes is light years ahead... >> >> sge > > >I am going to have to slightly disagree on this one. There is about 1 >track per single that is quite good. The other tracks are fair. The >overall sound of the singles is very much done in a world music style >(hell, I could see some of it being released on Peter Gabriel's Real World >label). The singles are definitely more straight forward (if not popish) >than other BD releases (there are a couple of exceptions though). A >definite try before you buy it release. The Jimmy Cauty remix on CD1 imho >is a highlight. But then again I am a sucker for anything KLF related. > >As for not for threes being light years ahead...well that is a whole >different can of worms... > > >-daniel >Head Monkey >Mad Monkey Records >