Re: (idm) re: classical (lovely)

From wells
Sent Wed, Feb 10th 1999, 07:52

At 07:54 PM 2/8/99 -0500, xxxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx wrote:
>Wow this is going to be my new pet peeve!
>I was using the world classical because it was the closest translation of what
>I could put into thought, and yes it was accurate. Why was it accurate?
>Because it works, that's why. When I say, "This kind of music will be the next
>classical music" How does that interpret in your mind? Well, if you're the
>average native english speaker then you understand what I meant. You
>understand that I meant this music will be the next wave of voiceless, vivid,
>and lucent music full of texture and deep artistic meaning created by crazy-
>headed wild-haired composers.

are we going to start comparing richard james, sean booth, and the like to
beethoven and mozart?

that's more than laughable.

next please.

- wells oliver / xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx.xxx
  "If you make me look bad, I swear to God, I'll never talk to you again."