From chad mossholder Sent Mon, Sep 27th 1999, 16:08
From chad mossholder Sent Mon, Sep 27th 1999, 16:08
Dave is right *IMHO* :) Chad . . . >From: "Dave Segal" <xxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx> >To: xxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx >Subject: Re: (idm) IMHO: Is it necessary? [was new Omni Trio?] >Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 11:06:08 -0400 > > >Afraid I have to disagree. There's a couple of good tracks, but the rest >is > >really watered down, weak, boring drum'n'bass. The Deepest Cut contianed > >some absolute all time d'n'b classics, Haunted Science was really good, > >Skeleton Keys was OK but never did much for me, and this...well, it's the > >first omni trio I wish I hadn't bothered buying. :( > > > >All IMHO of course. > >The IMHO acronym should be put to rest. I know it's Internet protocol, >but we should all realize that anything re: musical taste that anybody >posts >is "IMHO." To keep using it insults one's intelligence. Like, if you didn't >use >"IMHO" we would assume that what you're posting is undisputable fact? >Don't mind me, I'm just an editor who thinks too much about these kinds of >things. > >Dave Segal >Managing Editor/Alternative Press >Reviews/BPM/Reissue Redux/Origins Of Cool >Secret Ions on WCSB Thursdays 9-11PM EST www.wcsb.org > ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com