From general Sent Thu, Aug 6th 1998, 23:05
From general Sent Thu, Aug 6th 1998, 23:05
ninphil wrote: > > >Well, I guess the point is keeping it interesting for them is not > > necessarily the same as keeping us involved... for a band to be that > > disregarding of the desires of their audience is pretty off-putting, > > if you ask me. But it just goes to show why a live techno act is not > > treated the same as a live band. At any rate, it's not that I want my > > needs pandered to per se, I'd just like to be given some respect as a > > fan and be met 50/50. When they do what they do live, it's more like > > 95/5. And yes it may be > I don't get this complaint...you own the records rght? So you can listen > to those any day...personally watching a show of stuff I've never heard > before is more interesting...not less..."keeping it interesting for > themselves"...that's the best sign . Any artist that persues their own > vision and invites a live audience along with them is fine by me. Don't > be scared...live bands that jam and never play a song the same way once > are the ones who are famous for their live sets...not old wankers who > cane the same old hits the same old way.. > xxxoooo 'cept for the Rolling Stones...