Re: [AH] Behringer Stringer

From Giles Ward
Sent Fri, Feb 9th 2018, 22:39

Hmm!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E2oumeL_-4

On 09/02/2018 22:31, Michael Taylor wrote:
> This is going to sell to indie rock kids.
> 
> It will sell for the same reason the microkorg sold in the 00's.
> 
> All our synth gobbledygook only really matters to synth people. You 
> really don't need my in the way of synthesis to play strings, chords, 
> and melodies in a five piece rock band.
> 
> On Feb 9, 2018 5:20 PM, "Mike SynMike" <xxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx 
> <mailto:xxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>> wrote:
> 
>>     On Feb 9, 2018, at 10:40 AM, Marshall Craig <xxxxxx@xx.xxx
>>     <mailto:xxxxxx@xx.xxx>> wrote:
>>     Question- why have a string machine, when you can have an
>>     analog(-ish) poly? Weren’t string machines a sort of stop-gap 70’s
>>     poly, and faded when real polysynths became available?
> 
>     String machines sound different from synthesizers because of the top
>     octave generator and divide down and the chorus circuits. A
>     synthesizer can close to the sound sound, but it’s not exact. A
>     synthesizer is far more versatile, so better for most people. But if
>     you want “that” sound, you need a string machine.
> 
>     That said, I don’t expect this Behringer to be successful. I think
>     the guys who play string machines choose them at least in part
>     because they are old, ugly fake wood, limited, quirky, brand names
>     that nobody but synth geeks recognize, and there is no way the guy
>     down the street has the same one as you.
> 
>>     Also, these days I prefer /no/ keyboard and at least 8 voices. I
>>     already have some nice 76-key controllers.
> 
>     I understand the choice for no keys. But if it has keys, then it
>     should have enough keys to let the instrument do the job properly.
> 
>     For you, it sounds like 76 keys is a good number. I like 61 for
>     polysynths; With split keyboard 76 might be better but I’m willing
>     to live with 61 for portability sake. A vocoder with 4 octaves is
>     okay. A monosynth with 3 octaves is okay. But the synth industry is
>     chasing the customer. Customers seem to be voting with their dollars
>     with bigger numbers buying the cheapest stuff out there. So one way
>     to lower price is to cut an octave off.
> 
>     This Behringer needs 4 octaves like the Roland it copies. The 3
>     octaves is way too limited for using the Split keyboard function;
>     The lower side is only 1 octave.
> 
> 
>>>     On Feb 9, 2018, at 11:34 AM, Mike SynMike <xxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx
>>>     <mailto:xxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     I’m intrigued to try it.
>>>
>>>     Unfortunately, many of the new synths coming out these days that
>>>     interest me have 1 less octave than I want.
>>>     That should have 4 octaves instead of 3.
>>>     The Deepmind 12, OB6 and Prophet 6, System-8 and JD-XA, should
>>>     all be 5 octaves instead of 4.
>>>     The race to the bottom continues.
>>>
>>>     The number of 4 voice synths bothers me too. In the 80s the synth
>>>     industry kind of settled on the idea that a polysynth needs at
>>>     least 6 voices.
>>>
>>>
>>>>     On Feb 9, 2018, at 5:13 AM, Kenny Balys <xxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx
>>>>     <mailto:xxxxx@xxxxxxxx.xxx>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     First analogue stringer since the Hohner String Performer in 1981!
>>>>     (as far as I know)
>>>>
>>>>     https://i1.wp.com/www.synthtopia.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/behringer-string-synth-vocoder.jpg
>>>>     <https://i1.wp.com/www.synthtopia.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/behringer-string-synth-vocoder.jpg>
>>>
>>
> 
>