From Brian Willoughby Sent Sun, Jan 7th 2018, 08:48
From Brian Willoughby Sent Sun, Jan 7th 2018, 08:48
Hmm, how does that even work? If the frequency content of both vocoder inputs is the same, then I = would assume that the output would be unchanged. I suppose there would = be some dynamic expansion, on a per-band basis, but again I assume it = would be subtle. How much of the effect was due to chorus alone? You mention sending a longer decay to the modulator input. How do you = change the decay on a sound unless it=E2=80=99s a synthesizer? I suppose = at this point you would no longer be sending the same signal to both = inputs, if you=E2=80=99ve extended the decay on the modulator. If I had one of these devices sitting around, I could probably just = answer my own questions with a quick experiment to two. I=E2=80=99m = hoping you can give some more details so I can understand what you were = doing. Brian On Jan 5, 2018, at 2:11 PM, . . <xxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> wrote: > I use mine as a filterbank and human voice simulator by sending the = same signal to both vocoder inputs. >=20 > I get VP-330ish sounds from the SVC-350 that way, the vocoder's chorus = helps a lot in this case. >=20 > It works but I recall it could be improved by sending a signal with = longer decay to the modulator (mic) input.