Re: (idm) this is:\\(not a).PLAYLIST:8080

From Mr. Tangent
Sent Mon, Feb 22nd 1999, 11:12

At 02:24 AM 2/18/99 -0500, "imx++" <xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx> encoded:

>odis ON-1 wiL beeeeeuzzzzzz jeust four YOU SIR(&*!^%$(!%&*^!%(*^%!
>eyem s0o0o0o0o0o x-cyted. K!!!!!! so0o0o manee wayz t0o Re:s://pond.  shaL
>i ch0ose awt ov daHAT da HAT dahat.  ? (?) ! t'was the night before it was
>inevitabullshite thAT dahat dahat daHAT sumON-1 lyke Y O U R S E L F may-ed
><timestretch> suche a coMMmmmgood-ent. nd nowe i asK, wuz th,air-french
>band. anyeeee reezon u felt (smooth cloth that reminds me of 1st grade) the
>nee-eed eed to poSt (i still have your copy bitch) suche a *PER _ SON _ ELL*
>(dont tell mom the babysitters dead) note in teXXXt direcTed at know1 but M
>Y S E L F two one zero the list.!)(%!? i reELy shood nawt miRor this (better
>than that, 12" EXTREMELY LIMITED $15 (skam)) kynt ov behaveeour nd nd nd
>ndndndndndnd re:ply(wood) no(reverse)on list. list.  but i
>die-gresssssssssssssssssssssss (fades and and comes back in to sweeter:::::
>
>why the fuck am i writing this. fuck it.                               deel.
>dunlykedunreed.
>
>byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee::::::::::::::::luff, j*

Okay, I came off extremely harsh and for the most part what I wrote before
to imx++/Jeff was really unwarranted.  The reason I responded to you in the
first place was to illustrate, as I failed to do, that your highly
elaborate style turns some people off.  What I mean is that some people, as
I do, fail to get any coherent sense from most of your posts - and therefor
- usually delete without deciphering what you wrote.  It's as if you're
trying to alienate your potential "audience".  Regardless, I do admire your
style in a way and I apologize for the demeaning critique of your style -
perhaps you should channel this obvious energy and uniqueness into creating
other things?   I would think that your music would be rather interesting -
if it's anything like your typing style.  Perhaps not many people would
"get it", but it'd probably be esoteric and different nonetheless.  Sorry
for the intrusion.  :)

Mr. Tangent