Re: (idm) orb acetate

From rbc3
Sent Sun, Jun 7th 1998, 00:53

cl wrote:


> there has been a slight misunderstanding about this orb stuff.  it wasnt
> me that purchased the item in question.  i forwarded the message from
> the orb list because i knew some idm list members either had deals or
> were considering deals with marks rather impressive (if sketchy) auction
> list.  there has been another message that somewhat confirmed mark has
> had some shady behavior regarding this item in particular.  i dont want
> to start a flame war, i havent dealt with the man, and i dont want to
> ruin what may be a reputable record.

Boy, you sure have a fucked up way to approach a situation you
obviously know nothing about.  I don't know anything about it either,
but I'm not posting to a public list stating that someone's FOR SALE
(i.e. NOT AUCTION) list is sketchy.

I personally have had several dealings with Mark and am quite happy. 
I plan to do more in the future (in fact we have one in the works).  I
would not claim Mark to be sketchy OR shady and think it's in
extremely poor taste to do so.

The original person who posted has a problem with Mark.  That's fine. 
He has a right to rally people in his defense in order to set the
situation right.  He made a very professional post.  Cleitz did not. 
He posted a personal slander about something he knows nothing about.

Why can't the people on this list pull their head out of their asses
before they post?

-rbc3