Re: (idm) monkeys with samplers

From Tom Millar
Sent Thu, Jun 10th 1999, 00:29


xxxxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx wrote:
> 
> << I can live with sampling when it's used as an instrumental substitution,
>  no different really than someone using a 303 instead of a trombone.>>
> 
> And I suspect that most people on this list listen to more 303 than trombone.
>  So the replacement has surpassed the original...in some quarters.

Not capricious on gratuitous substitution, substitution with a purpose.
As when Hrvatski points out that you can get some amazing sounds through
sample teaking and whatnot that you could never get out of trad.
synthesis. Or using a sampler to do loop multitracking, which is why the
Yamaha SU10 keeps looking more attractive to me every day.

> Are you familiar with collage as a visual art form?  It was practiced by
> Picasso and other well-known artists.

But good collage has an idea and artistic direction behind it, whereas
the Chembros just take newsprint and spray adhesive to a piece of
posterboard and come up with predictably pedestrian results.

> While I love the sound of a good Oberheim, I'd take the MPC-3000 material
> over the Oberheim material in a second.  Without question.  But are they
> "mad" monkeys?  Or, is Peter Naismith among them?

No, they are new world monkeys equipped with prehensile tails, giving
each of them the ability to manipulate one more slider in real-time than
Autechre can.

Tom