From toothtrouble Sent Thu, Jul 5th 2007, 14:22
From toothtrouble Sent Thu, Jul 5th 2007, 14:22
Editing a switch value with a rotary pot is definitely a minus, but in my mind less of a minus than having to flip through 'programs' of parameters on the Novation. Also I can lay down an overlay on the Doepfer (that punkdISCO linked to) that will have the parameter names, so that's not a big issue. MM-11 wrote: > > 2007/7/5, toothtrouble <xxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>: >> >> Ah, thanks for responding... I think the Drehbank is going to be the >> winner, >> at least for now. I forgot this thing existed. I also like the idea >> of >> being able to control 2 mks-80's if I ever wanted to. > > I seriously can't understand why anyone would buy a Drehbank > considering it's more expensive than a Novation Remote Zero SL. Having > two large displays that show parameter names and actual values is > invaluable. MPG-80 has almost as many switches as it has sliders, and > these are not very intuitive to edit with a rotary pot. The Remote SL > series is IMHO a better option than some dedicated programmers out > there. > > /MM > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Controlling-a-Roland-Super-Jupiter-tf4021811.html#a11447503 Sent from the Analogue Heaven mailing list archive at Nabble.com.