Re: [AH] EML, EMS, Doepfer

From Kent Williams
Sent Mon, Apr 3rd 2000, 23:10

On Mon, 3 Apr 2000 xxxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx wrote:
> I'm considering an EML 101, VCS 3 or a Doepfer A100.  I'd like something 
> flexible, patchable and dependable.  I'll be using it primarily for evolving 
> drones, textures, sound effects and treatments.  

EMLs are cool, but when I've messed with one it's seemed pretty thin and
harsh sounding.  I even had one for about a year on loan from Dvorkin
the Mad Russian, and never really found sounds on it I liked particularly.

I own an EMS Putney, and while I think it's a cool piece, and I use
it all the time, it's not very easy to use tonally. It's more useful,
because of it's unpredictability and spastic tracking (from CV) as a
sound processor.

They're also old and require a lot of TLC to keep running.  I got mine 
at a bargain price from a jr. high school, but I've had it in the shop 3 
times since for things going wrong. As a matter of fact when I turned
it on to test it, it worked for five minutes and went silent!

Basically the EMS units were constructed very cheaply over 30 years ago,
so there are a lot of parts on them that are marginal.  This may actually
contribute to the sound in interesting ways, but no way would I pay $2k
for one. 

I even have the custom EMS vinyl dust cover for mine -- I should put it
on EBAY and see what it fetches ;-)

I've also used a Doepfer, and I think it's probably the #1 'starter modular'
you can get -- relatively cheap, relatively powerful, and you can use it for
'bread and butter' modules, and then add on stuff from MOTM, Blacet etc.