From Sham Beam Sent Thu, Oct 23rd 2014, 07:20
From Sham Beam Sent Thu, Oct 23rd 2014, 07:20
more glitches!! On 10/23/2014 5:36 PM, Esa Ruoho wrote: > ahh, i see what you mean John - build your own tracks by artist xyz, > made to-order. > like a subway sandwich. > "i'll have 909 claps and a 606 rimshot, and a walking acoustic bassline, > hold the glitches" > > > On 23 October 2014 09:33, John D. <xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx > <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx>> wrote: > > Might work. Maybe an artist could have an individual app. > > I like my idea though. "Want some claps here? Pay just $.09!" >> nah, more like, you have an album, but to unlock extra bonus >> tracks, you have to pay 0.99 or so. and then they'd be inside the >> app. >> >> >> On 23 October 2014 05:19, John D. <xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx >> <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx>> wrote: >> >> With sounds missing, like? It could be ambient maybe unless >> you purchased the beats. >> >>> there's that word "decent" right between "got" and >>> "monetization". >>> >>> i wonder if an album app with in-app-purchases would make a dime >>> >>> --- >>> http://lackluster.bandcamp.com >>> http://lackluster.org >>> http://esaruoho.tumblr.com >>> iPhone: +358403703659 <tel:%2B358403703659> >>> >>>> On 22 Oct 2014, at 23:52, Esa Juhani Ruoho >>>> <xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx <mailto:xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>> wrote: >>>> >>>> so anyone think Best Fiends has got monetization or is it >>>> all an in-app-purchase rip-off? >>>> >>>> --- >>>> http://lackluster.bandcamp.com <http://lackluster.bandcamp.com/> >>>> http://lackluster.org <http://lackluster.org/> >>>> http://esaruoho.tumblr.com <http://esaruoho.tumblr.com/> >>>> iPhone: +358403703659 <tel:%2B358403703659> >>>> >>>>> On 22 Oct 2014, at 23:51, Jared Dunne <xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx >>>>> <mailto:xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Be well, my friend, Jon. >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 22, 2014 3:49 PM, "Jon Sands" <xxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx >>>>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 10/22/2014 3:31 PM, Jared Dunne wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Oh, the beautiful human trait of deflection. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nah, I think I just speak for the majority of this list >>>>> (and Zack summed it up well) that nobody is really >>>>> interested in wasting any more effort responding to the >>>>> extremely poor straw man you have repeatedly tried to >>>>> make. We'd rather talk about something interesting. I >>>>> think the moment you made the hilarious comparison of >>>>> physical objects to copyright, most of the people here >>>>> lost interest in you. It's ok though, I'm sure you'll >>>>> get some poor sap here soon willing to argue with you >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jon Sands >>>>> Fohdeesha Media >>>>> http://fohdeesha.com/ >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > -- Sham Beam