Re: (idm) comments??

From Simon Paul
Sent Wed, Sep 8th 1999, 18:24

Fave lines:
"All you're doing is sitting in a corner, sucking your thumb. And if that's engaging
with the music, then I'm happy to be an old bastard who still lives with his mother."

heh heh heh.....he's definitely a master of irony....ah well to each their own,
writing about music is like dancing about architecture anyway :P

sp

Irene McC wrote:

> This was written by a friend who's a free-lance correspondent for a (South
> African) magazine called SL : this was posted on their on-line site and had my
> jaw hanging open :-)  I'd be curious to hear other people's opinions on the topic.
> http://sly.co.za/flashbaby_060999.asp
>
> Monday, 6 September
> The Body Electric
> Miles Keylock
> Flashbaby ponders just how people engage with music
>
> It's no revelation that I have a fundamental problem with the way people seem
> (not) to listen to music these days. It's been a major thorn in my proverbial hide
> that so-called dance music genres - music that's sole function is as a
> commodity which primarily allows people to dance - have such a following in
> this country.
>
> Perhaps it's not really a question of insisting that one listen to the music, now
> is it? Isn't it more an issue of how - or whether at all - people actually engage
> with the music. Be this cerebrally - a desire for an escape from the stimulus of
> the body, or viscerally - a search for transcendence through the body itself.
> Perhaps this is one reason why fans of dance music are only too willing to
> tolerate self-indulgent and exaggerated sets from DJs.
>
> Don't let anyone try and tell you otherwise, dancing to house music or drum
> and bass or trance is about the individual losing contact with the body, literally
> getting out of their heads. Ultimately dance music is not about the DJ - who, if
> anything serves merely as a conman, a visage, a cover version of the author.
> And don't listen to your friends whining on about how "electronic music is so
> cool because it's about the death of the author and the search for a new
> signifier confronted with the pre-millennium realities of this post-modern era."
> Bollocks! God is not a DJ! And a DJ will never be God.
>
> Despite their posturing endeavours there is no way that listening to a DJ spin a
> few discs or a couple of records can have as meaningfully a corporeal effect as
> watching a Nude Girls, a Groinchurn, a Nine, or a Fetish live onstage. These
> people are gods!
>
> The appeal of rock music is that it speaks precisely to the body. It's about
> embracing the fleshly textures of the music in all it's potential carnality: it's
> about sex, booze, drugs and rock'n roll. All you have to do is listen and hear.
> Whether you dance or not isn't an end in itself. By contrast, dance music is
> simply about denial of the body. It's about a new age, smart drinking, asexual
> looking, pill-popping paranoia of the flesh.
>
> The next time you go to a drum and bass club, just have a look at where the
> kids are. Deep inside their own heads and way up their own arses. I'm sorry,
> that's certainly not listening to the music. 'Cos if anything, dancing with and
> inside yourself seems kinda sad to me. Who are you communicating with? The
> DJ? I don't think so. They're definitely playing the music for themselves.
> Perhaps the beats then? Oh, please. I think not. All you're doing is sitting in a
> corner, sucking your thumb. And if that's engaging with the music, then I'm
> happy to be an old bastard who still lives with his mother.