From David Bivins Sent Tue, Feb 12th 2019, 19:33
From David Bivins Sent Tue, Feb 12th 2019, 19:33
Live movies under $900? Shut up and take my money! But seriously, what did you mean before autocorrect messed up? On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 2:30 PM negativesaucer <xxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> w= rote: > > Looking at the movies live as well since they can be had new for just und= er $900usd > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 12:13 AM Edward Schultheis <xxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> wrot= e: >> >> MPCX lover here as well. >> Intuitive workflow just like any MPC, quick and easy to just create tra= cks. >> I feel like theres a lot of haters because they associate with strictly= hip hop, but its just another tool. Just depends on how you use it! >> Oh, and AWESOME updates >> >> On Feb 11, 2019, at 9:03 PM, Scott Fox <xxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> wrote: >> >> No mate. I have found the MPC X/Live to a complete toraiz killer for my = workflow. >> >> Scott >> >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 4:33 AM Alex Timchak <xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx wrote: >>> >>> Do you still use the SP-16 in your live rig Scott? >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 5:16 PM Quincas Moreira <xxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> wro= te: >>>> >>>> I wonder if it's in any way preferable than a good old MPC 1000 with J= JOS >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 5:04 PM Scott Fox <xxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> It's a lot of fun. Simpler and more straightforward than an octatrack= but not quite as deep. Does parameter locks, great with loops and one shot= s but can't stream large audio files. The analog filter is fantastic. The c= ustomer support is shit. The build quality is good. If you want a straightf= orward performance tool that can give you great visual feedback, it's worth= it. >>>>> >>>>> Scott >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019, 12:00 AM negativesaucer <xxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.x= om wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> anyone have one of these and want to provide any feedback? itching = for a new sampler with more structure than the 404. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Quincas Moreira >>>> Synth Diy Guy