(idm) Fw: (313) Economics 4 All: LETS TAKE BACK OUR SCENE

From IndieRevolt
Sent Fri, Jan 30th 1998, 17:34

> - with the techno market being in the rut it is there should maybe be a
> forum for labels to bump heads rather than bump egos and then bump sales
at
> this point in time.  n.a. is far from europe is far from asia etc.  There
> is virtually no internationally marketing for most of the independants.
> distributors simply cannot take the risk.  in PERFECT COMPETITION we
would
> plan together as a group.  since last year these Major label guys have
> tried to monopolize the retail channels that indies find difficult to
> access.  The adverse trickle down effect is that the independant
> distributors and labels are losing not "riding the wave" as the major
> labels and their Media attack would like everyone to beleive.
> 
> If these major corporation didnt saturate OUR independant market (the one
> belonging to the consumers and the ind. producers) then we would not be
> struggling right know for a) retail shelf space b) the consumers
attention
> and c) distributor wholsale price floors.  In our newsletter this month:
> ________________
> "1) The year started off with problems collecting last years accounts
> receivable from distributers.         After talking with the independant
> distributers   i realized that this last "Electronic-ha"
> craze had hurt the independant distributors of underground electronic
> music. It seems that many small labels are suffering.  I think that most
of
> us forcasted this but We cannot let "the ship" sink.  
> 
>         Discussing 1998 for Techno/electronic music with the Larger distributors
> only
> brought to my dismay their demand to bring onto the label "bigger
artists".
>  I hold strong in any forum that the music and artists on the label from
> the Regions we represent is strong if not stronger than these  other
> "bigger
> artists" which were prefabed to saturate the mass consumer market.  I
stand
> my ground to say that "We as a collective of innovative
> artists deserve as much attention and recognition as "big" artists. We
are
> inovators and not immitators. Those "famous" acts are "acts" and have and
> still do misrepresent us to the masses. they are also giving us a bad
> image.  
> ______________
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>