RE: (idm) Hip-hop history/CD philosophy

From Kelley Hackett
Sent Wed, Apr 21st 1999, 15:45

Darren is Right my friend Sam,


U seem to be looking at this thing from now, but in order to understand
anything U must first start from the beginning.

Rappers dont need bands(music).  Typically, while in NYC or D.C., I
always wanted buddies to kick free-styles, for that is when they are at
their best.  Not when music is playing behind their rapps.  

To each his own, but there is nothing like walking up to a cat and say
"bust a free"  and he begins!  In fact, if he cant, or says I need
music---I just walk away!

Hk-10!

> -----Original Message-----
> From:        Sam Frank [SMTP:xxxxxx.xxxxx@xxxx.xxx]
> Sent:        Tuesday, April 20, 1999 7:30 PM
> To:        Darren Keast
> Cc:        xxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxx; xxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
> Subject:        Re: (idm) Hip-hop history/CD philosophy
> 
> > 
> > "Correct me if I'm wrong, but there's not a rap song to be
> > heard, janky remixes aside, where the beats don't define to the last
> letter
> > the method of rapping on top."
> > 
> > i agree...but that's putting the cart before the horse...the
> producer is being
> > paid by the MC to make a beat that define the MCs flow.
> 
> Then why is every rapper going out of their way to fit their rhyme
> style
> around Timbaland's beats?  Obviously it cuts both ways. However, one
> of
> the great things about pop hip-hop is how willing even established
> artists
> are to adapt to new production, new beats, new sounds. When a new
> sound
> acquires some sort of critical mass, MCs will get on board with the
> producers.  Determinism of any kind is never *the* answer, but it can
> be
> *an* answer.  I'm just curious whether anyone's read anything that
> pays
> attention to the beats, and how they shape flow and content.
> 
> Sam