From Sham Beam Sent Thu, Oct 23rd 2014, 07:30
From Sham Beam Sent Thu, Oct 23rd 2014, 07:30
that's b-grade. On 10/23/2014 6:26 PM, Esa Juhani Ruoho wrote: > there is also a "i'm too poor to accomplish anything" 0.99 glitch > package that just randomly cuts out all audio for 3 seconds. > > --- > http://lackluster.bandcamp.com > http://lackluster.org > http://esaruoho.tumblr.com > iPhone: +358403703659 > >> On 23 Oct 2014, at 10:25, Sham Beam <xxxx.xxxx@xxxxx.xxx >> <mailto:xxxx.xxxx@xxxxx.xxx>> wrote: >> >> Damn, that's some premium glitching! Must be awesome, sold! >> >> An artist could have a bigger audience if they provided multiple mixes >> based on the listeners preferences. Clark with slide guitar for >> country fans. >> >> >> >> >> On 10/23/2014 6:22 PM, Esa Ruoho wrote: >>> would you like the premium glitch package for the 16.99 - guaranteed to >>> glitch up all the tracks in the application! >>> >>> >>> On 23 October 2014 10:20, Sham Beam <xxxx.xxxx@xxxxx.xxx >>> <mailto:xxxx.xxxx@xxxxx.xxx> >>> <mailto:xxxx.xxxx@xxxxx.xxx>> wrote: >>> >>> more glitches!! >>> >>> >>> On 10/23/2014 5:36 PM, Esa Ruoho wrote: >>> >>> ahh, i see what you mean John - build your own tracks by >>> artist xyz, >>> made to-order. >>> like a subway sandwich. >>> "i'll have 909 claps and a 606 rimshot, and a walking acoustic >>> bassline, >>> hold the glitches" >>> >>> >>> On 23 October 2014 09:33, John D. <xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx >>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx> >>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx> >>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.__xx >>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx>>> wrote: >>> >>> Might work. Maybe an artist could have an individual app. >>> >>> I like my idea though. "Want some claps here? Pay just $.09!" >>> >>> nah, more like, you have an album, but to unlock extra >>> bonus >>> tracks, you have to pay 0.99 or so. and then they'd be >>> inside the >>> app. >>> >>> >>> On 23 October 2014 05:19, John D. >>> <xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx >>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx> <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx> >>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.__xx >>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx>>> wrote: >>> >>> With sounds missing, like? It could be ambient >>> maybe unless >>> you purchased the beats. >>> >>> there's that word "decent" right between >>> "got" and >>> "monetization". >>> >>> i wonder if an album app with in-app-purchases >>> would make a dime >>> >>> --- >>> http://lackluster.bandcamp.com >>> http://lackluster.org >>> http://esaruoho.tumblr.com >>> iPhone: +358403703659 <tel:%2B358403703659> >>> <tel:%2B358403703659> >>> >>> On 22 Oct 2014, at 23:52, Esa Juhani Ruoho >>> <xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx >>> <mailto:xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> >>> <mailto:xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> >>> <mailto:xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx >>> <mailto:xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>>> wrote: >>> >>> so anyone think Best Fiends has got >>> monetization or is it >>> all an in-app-purchase rip-off? >>> >>> --- >>> http://lackluster.bandcamp.com >>> <http://lackluster.bandcamp.__com/ >>> <http://lackluster.bandcamp.com/>> >>> http://lackluster.org <http://lackluster.org/> >>> http://esaruoho.tumblr.com <http://esaruoho.tumblr.com/> >>> iPhone: +358403703659 <tel:%2B358403703659> >>> <tel:%2B358403703659> >>> >>> On 22 Oct 2014, at 23:51, Jared Dunne >>> <xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx <mailto:xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> >>> <mailto:xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> >>> <mailto:xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx >>> <mailto:xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>>> wrote: >>> >>> Be well, my friend, Jon. >>> >>> On Oct 22, 2014 3:49 PM, "Jon Sands" >>> <xxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx >>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> <mailto:xxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> >>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx >>> <mailto:xxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>>> wrote: >>> >>> On 10/22/2014 3:31 PM, Jared Dunne >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Oh, the beautiful human trait >>> of deflection. >>> >>> >>> Nah, I think I just speak for the >>> majority of this list >>> (and Zack summed it up well) that >>> nobody is really >>> interested in wasting any more >>> effort responding to the >>> extremely poor straw man you have >>> repeatedly tried to >>> make. We'd rather talk about >>> something interesting. I >>> think the moment you made the >>> hilarious comparison of >>> physical objects to copyright, most >>> of the people here >>> lost interest in you. It's ok >>> though, I'm sure you'll >>> get some poor sap here soon willing >>> to argue with you >>> >>> -- >>> Jon Sands >>> Fohdeesha Media >>> http://fohdeesha.com/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sham Beam >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Sham Beam >> >> > -- Sham Beam